Saturday, April 26, 2014

NY Times Admits It Pushed Fabricated Evidence

Why Everyone Should Occupy US 1% Corporate Media: They Lie
Mainstream Media Is Being Forced to Retract Its Propaganda:
The New York Times pushed fabricated evidence in the run up to the Iraq war.   A year later, the newspaper apologized for its inaccurate, one-sided coverage.
The U.S. and the New York Times pretended that Syria’s government was responsible for the chemical weapons attack … but that claim was debunked, and even the New York Times was forced to retract it several months later.  (Truth Researchers, including Pulitzer prize winning reporter Seymour Hersh, has also pointed out that it was the Syrian rebels – with the help of the Turkish government – did it).
Then the U.S. and the New York Times pretended that they had proof that Russian soldiers were the mysterious “masked men” seizing government buildings in Russia.  But a couple of days later, they were forced reporting from the alternative media – especially Robert Parry, winner of the George Polk Award for National Reporting – into retracting that claim, and admitting that their “proof” was almost as flimsy as proof of Saddam’s “weapons of mass destruction”.
It seems like the alternative media is forcing the New York Times to retract half-baked, pro-war, propaganda claims more and more quickly.
-Chris Rath- Truth Researcher, Orwellian Eye Australia.

1 comment:

  1. Nothing 2 b said really. Everything we've always known :--)))((((---:


Please be advised that submitted comments will only be published if they are free from obscene profanity, explicit phrases and personal character assassinations containing explicit language. Please feel free to express your opinion, however we do request that all comments are of a courteous nature. No abusive or vulgar comments will be published.