Wednesday, June 11, 2014

SCAM EXPOSED: Chemotherapy 97% Ineffective

A study published in August 2003 revealed that of adult cancer in the USA and Australia, the use of chemotherapy, when looking at adjuvant and curative use, provided a cure only 2.1% of the time in the USA and 2.3% of the time in Australia.

The study undertook a literature search for randomized clinical trials which saw a 5-year survival rate that was attributed solely to cytotoxic chemotherapy in adult malignancies. The data was taken from the cancer registry in Australia and from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results data in the USA for 1998. As stated, the final results show that the overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA.

In the video below Dr. Peter Glidden cites the study that concludes better than 97% of the time, chemotherapy does not work. Yet it’s one of the main treatments in the battle against cancer. Dr. Glidden explains why that’s still the case.



  1. It is a criminal scam. My mother was declared “cancer free’ and died 2 weeks later from chemo complications. The “cure” killed her. She would have lived longer without it.

  2. been saying for yrs Chemo is bullish*t and don’t do it- ppl get scared but really you can kill it naturally seen it with my own eyes with my late MIL with macrobiotics ( she still smoked so she died of emphysema ) the man who got her on macrobiotics cured his mom of liver cancer- I myself wen to see a man here in Massachusetts who does energy testing to see what foods are bad for your particular body and has cured tons of ppl in 30 yrs. I eat an alkaline diet to keep it at bay and if ppl ate this way and mediated you would see cancer rates drop dramatically- get off the GMO food, fluoride water supply- exercise, laugh- go out into nature- this is what heals period!

  3. The FDA probably proposed a study to try to understand why the Australian rate of “survival” is SO MUCH higher than the US rate.

    That would figure. Of course, the Aussies probably did the same thing

  4. Good article based on fact. But are we sure that
    1. 3% who survived are due to the success of chemo? Did the patience do something else such as diet or cannabis?
    2. 97% who died are not due to the poison of chemo? When a doctor tells a patient that he has 3 month to live, most likely he has more time, but chemo really take his life away.
    The conclusion should be chemo kills. There was a clinical trial in the 80′s at UM Hospital for Ovarian cancer patients. Totally 123 patients participated. Only 1 survived, the lone survival undertook diet change and juicing. All patients were told not to do other treatments in order to be admitted to the trial program.

  5. The tiny so-called cure rates for chemotherapy are probably less than the spontaneous remission rates with no treatment at all. For the claim that chemo accelerates the failure rate remission w/o treatment must be higher or at least provides a longer survival time. The weakness here is that very few people reject these prescribed treatments so there are insufficient numbers to provide reliable statistics. This absence plays into the hands of the pharmaceutical industry.


Please be advised that submitted comments will only be published if they are free from obscene profanity, explicit phrases and personal character assassinations containing explicit language. Please feel free to express your opinion, however we do request that all comments are of a courteous nature. No abusive or vulgar comments will be published.