Tuesday, September 23, 2014

5 Companies That Make Big Money By Keeping You Terrified of Terror Attacks

A massive industry profits from government-induced fear of terrorism. If we place our 'fear of the boogy man' aside for five minutes and actually follow the money trail back to the source, it doesn't take too long before the veil of illusion is lifted and the real perpetrators are revealed
Australian citizens express disagreement with authority's handling of alleged 'terror threat', disgruntled social media tweet states "I don't need theater to feel safe. I need facts".

Michael Hayden, the former director of the National Security Agency, has invaded America’s television sets in recent weeks to warn about Edward Snowden’s leaks and the continuing terrorist threat to America. Last night (22nd September 2014) the Australian Minister for Justice Michael Keenan appeared on ABC's Q&A program, warning Australian citizens of virtually exactly the same threat here on Australian soil. However Mr Keenan appeared to struggle with convincing a culturally diverse Australian audience accompanied by a typhoon of tweeters who had no hesitation in expressing their disagreement with the Australian authorities' handling of the current situation.

The other Q&A panel members which included Curtin University researcher Dr Anne Aly, Australian Greens Senator Scott Ludlam who implied during the program that Mr Keenan opportunistically Hollywood-ized the threat and Novelist Lawyer Randa Abdel-Fattah who exercised truly remarkable speaking as she addressed issues with great conviction and clarity during the program which appeared to point out the elephant in the room.
Watch The Full Q&A Episode Here>> 'Be Alert But Not Alarmed' ABC Australia.

What often goes unmentioned, as the Guardian’s Glenn Greenwald pointed out, is that USA's Michael Hayden has a financial stake in keeping Americans scared and on a permanent war footing against Islamic militants. The private firm he works for, the Chertoff Group, is not the only one making big money by scaring westerners. Could this possibly be the scenario which is now unfolding in Australia?  Could this alleged 'terror threat' be nothing more than another 9/11 false flag staged theater implemented purposely to strip people of their basic freedoms and human rights and to introduce further totalitarian surveillance?

Who Benefits? Follow The Money Trail:

There are inconceivably huge amounts of profits to be made from keeping a population in a constant state of fear with a false sense of 'protection' from an over-exaggerated enemy who may be nothing more than a group of basement dwelling internet nerds who pose no real threat to national security what so ever, which is just as likely to be the case as any other possibility as no real hard evidence has yet been given by the authorities to the Australian public other than a few online videos which are obviously fake, and an alleged Islamic terror letter which could have been constructed by anyone who can use Microsoft Word. 

So let's get real, sure it's reasonable to assume that there is indeed extremist activity going on in the middle east, and yes it's reasonable to assume that Australia may have received a mention from an extremist group, but the manner in which the Australian mainstream media has shamelessly exploited the issue is absolutely sickening to say the least. Fear mongering and fear porn have been at the very axis of news headlines over the past few weeks which to say the least resembles some cheesy B grade Hollywood action movie in which the authorities appear to be more than happy to play a part in as the super heroes who save the world from the boogy man.  

It has now become so ridiculous in Australia that it's beginning to manifest into a bit of a joke, the tip of the iceberg being when a Melbourne man was hauled off a Tiger Airways flight by federal police last Saturday after claims were made by another passenger aboard the airliner that he was seen doodling and writing sentences in a notebook satirising the current terrorism threat.

The alleged terror note by Oliver Bucksworth which got him removed from the plane

Oliver Buckworth , a 28 year old interior designer stated: "The irony is I was writing a sentence about the absurdity of the fear-mongering when we live in such a happy country of ice-cream and beaches and fluffy things,"

Tiger Airways notified the Australian Federal Police, who "offloaded" Mr Buckworth. After being interviewed and undergoing a background check, Mr Buckworth was released without charge.

Read The Full Article Here>>  Passenger Ejected From Flight Over Notebook Doodles

The Growing of Awareness:

MH 17 and MH 370 is already being ripped to shreds by Conspiracy Analysts. Vested financial interests are continuing to surface everywhere from both incidents.  

Most of the world is now aware that 9/11 was a huge scam (unless one is delusional or a hermit) which cost the lives of many people.

Most individuals are now even starting to question the blatantly obvious and terribly orchestrated 'Sandy Hook' saga which employed 6 of the same crisis actors that were used years later in the Boston Bombing.

Australians in particular are becoming increasingly aware of the obvious. The dangers of sodium fluoride which is fortified into the Australian public water supply are being voiced by more and more people, with anti-fluoride activist groups and campaigns popping up everywhere. Most individuals in Australia have thankfully now clued onto the fact that our so called 'leaders' have no real genuine interest in the people's safety or civilian security whatsoever. Most have figured out the fact that political positions are nothing more than a 'get rich quick scheme' orchestrated by the big major banking cartels to use politicians as puppets to fulfill their economic and world domination agendas.

Millions of dollars were made from Sandy Hook, 9/11 and the Boston Marathon. Facts show that the families involved in Sandy Hook were given paid incentives and their mortgages were all paid off in full virtually straight after the alleged disasters occurred. It is not only highly unethical to accept millions upon billions of dollars in donations from a dumbed down yet well intentioned populous for pretending that other people died (and in the case of 9/11, did die), it is also a major conflict of interest when governments that are supposedly responsible for the investigation of these so called disasters are also collecting charity donations for the victim's families. To put it all in a simple manner, theoretically speaking if a parent's child has just been murdered, their entire world would be completely turned upside down, they aren't usually on National TV the very next day pledging for donations to 'ease their suffering'.

Globally, people are continually loosing what little trust they may have had left in the status quo, all of the facts regarding 9/11, Sandy Hook, Boston etc, are now all out in the open in the public domain with most people now investigating their own truths online rather than relying on mainstream media propaganda for falsified information.

What may post a greater threat to humanity right now, is when the internet is taken away or becomes filtered so strongly that it becomes virtually useless, when it gets fully hijacked by the status quo to the full extent it will become nothing more than another propaganda box.

Conspiracy Analysts  have predicted that the imminent seizure of the internet by the status quo will most certainly come in the disguise of a 'national security' crisis and it will be sold under the umbrella of 'for your own protection', which of coarse we all know is ludicrous and is nothing more than the Hegelian Dialect Formula (Problem, Reaction, Solution) being implemented to impose a specific agenda: the further dumbing down of the population for totalitarian mind control and surveillance.

Post-9/11 the western world has witnessed a boom in private firms dedicated to the hyped-up threat of terrorism. The drive to privatize national security apparatus's accelerated in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and it’s gotten to the point where 70 percent of the national intelligence budget is now spent on private contractors, as author Tim Shorrock reported.  Private intelligence contractors have profited to the tune of at least $6 billion a year. In 2010, the Washington Post revealed that there are 1,931 private firms across America alone dedicated to fighting terrorism. Imagine how many there are if you add all other western countries to that figure. Bankers are making trillions of fiat dollars from this very industry.

What it all adds up to is a massive industry profiting off government-induced fear of terrorism, even though Americans are more likely to be killed by a car crash or a piece of their own furniture than a terror attack; and in Australia you're more likely to be killed by an apple than a terror attack.

Here are five private companies cashing in on keeping you afraid:


1. The Chertoff Group


On August 11, former NSA head Michael Hayden, the man at the center of the Bush administration's 2005 surveillance scandal, was defending his former agency on CBS News in the wake of the latest NSA spying scandal. Commenting on President Obama's half-hearted promises to reform some NSA practices, Hayden told host Bob Schieffer that “the President is trying to take some steps to make the American people more comfortable about what it is we're doing. That's going to be hard because, frankly, Bob, some steps to make Americans more comfortable will actually make Americans less safe.”

Former Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff had a similar message when he appeared on ABC News August 4. Speaking about the purported threat from an Al Qaeda affiliate in Yemen that led to the closure of 19 U.S. embassies, Chertoff said that “the collection of this warning information [about Al Qaeda] came from the kinds of programs we've been discussing about, the ability to capture communications overseas.”

CBS and ABC did not see fit to inform viewers that both Hayden and Chertoff are employees of the Chertoff Group, a private firm created in 2009 that companies hire to consult on best practices for security and combatting terrorism. Some of the companies the firm advises go on to win government contracts. Chertoff is the founder and chairman of the group, while Hayden serves as a principal. So they profit off a war on terror they say is crucial to keeping Americans safe.

Though it's unclear how much in total exactly the firm makes, there are some known numbers. After the failed attempt in 2010 to blow up an airliner on Christmas Day with a bomb hidden in underwear, Chertoff pushed for better airport security procedures. One of the suggestions Chertoff made was for the Transportation Security Agency to use full-body scanners like the ones Rapiscan, one of the Chertoff Group's clients, made. And sure enough, after the Christmas Day plot, the TSA ordered 300 Rapiscan machines. The Huffington Post reported that Rapiscan made $118 million from the government between 2009-2010.

2. Booz Allen Hamilton


This private intelligence contractor has become a household name in the wake of the NSA scandal. Edward Snowden, the man responsible for leaking secret documents that exposed the breadth of NSA surveillance, was working for Booz Allen when he downloaded the documents he handed off to media outlets. As the New York Times reported in June, the company parlays its technology expertise for intelligence uses into massive government contracts. Thousands of employees of the company provide services to the NSA, like analyzing the massive amounts of data the government agency collects every day. The company is also the shining symbol of the government-private security complex's revolving door: its vice president is the former director of national intelligence, while the current director of national intelligence is a former employee of Booz Allen.

Despite the Snowden security breach, Booz Allen continues to work with the government. And they're making a lot of money from the U.S. In the last fiscal year, the company made $1.3 billion from working in U.S. intelligence. In total, Booz Allen Hamiltion made over $5 billion last fiscal year. And the cash keeps coming: in January, the company announced that it had won a contract with the Defense Department to provide intelligence services. The amount of money it could make from the deal is up to $5.6 billion.

And like Hayden and Chertoff, Booz Allen's vice president Mike McConnell has publicly hyped up the threat of terrorism to blast Snowden's leaks. McConnell told a government contracting conference in July 2013 that Snowden's leaks have done “irrevocable damage” to the U.S.'s ability to stop terrorism. “It’s going to inhibit our ability to understand nuclear activity in North Korea, what’s going on in Syria, what might be happening with the Taliban in Afghanistan,” said McConnell.


3. Science Applications International Corporation

Sometimes referred to as “NSA West” because so many former NSA employees go on to work for the formerly California-based Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), this firm makes a ton of cash off government contracts. And they do so by hawking their expertise in combating the terrorist threat.


Browse through SAIC's website and you're constantly greeted with the words “terrorist threat” and information on how the SAIC can help the government and others battle it. SAIC developed a “Terrorism Protection Manual” for Florida law enforcement that was developed to fight “today's national terrorist threat and implement recommended security best practices.” They boast of their “experience meeting the terrorism incident response training needs of a wide variety of customers, from training for a national Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) scenario, applicable at agency response levels, to lesser levels of incidents affecting a city, a military installation or a special facility.”

Back when John P. Jumper, the current CEO of SAIC, was an Air Force general, he said the threat of terrorism is “greater than Nazism, greater than communism. This threat that we have of terrorist zealots is the most dangerous because these are people who care nothing about life. They care nothing about our lives, for sure, and they care nothing about their own lives.” And Larry Prior, a U.S. intelligence veteran who used to run the company's Intelligence and Security Group, said in an internal newsletter that “the future of the nation rests on their backs,” referring to employees in his group.

SAIC is an immensely lucrative and large company. It boasts 42,000 employees—20,000 of whom hold U.S. government security clearances. It is the NSA's largest contractor, according to CorpWatch, and is deeply involved in the NSA's collection of intelligence. Last year it reported a net income of $525 million.

4. Center for Counterintelligence and Security Studies 

U.S. intelligence agencies aren't the only sectors of government where the private sector has cashed in on the fear of terrorism. The post-9/11 world has seen the blossoming of a cottage industry of self-styled “experts” on Islam from private companies that market their supposedly ironclad analysis of the threat from Islamists to other federal agencies and state and local law enforcement. These companies have profited from law enforcement taking part in the “war on terror.”


Through Homeland Security grant programs like the State Homeland Security Program and the Urban Areas Security Initiative, the federal government has doled out over billions of dollars to these private companies to provide Islamophobic training. One of these companies is called the Center for Counterintelligence and Security Studies.

Based in Virginia, the center “posits radical Islam as a new global ideological menace on the order of the old communist threat from the Soviet Union,” as Political Research Associates (PRA) noted in a 2011 report on private firms doing counter-terror training. Staff members include former FBI, CIA and Defense Department personnel.

Their claim to fame is providing education and training to members of the U.S. national security community—including law enforcement agencies, according to their website. They say they have trained over 67,000 people over the past decade.

It's unclear exactly how much this firm makes per year. But according to the PRA report, a five-day course for government employees on the “Global Jihadist Threat Doctrine” costs $39,280. The firm also lists the costs of individual courses on their website. For a 30-person class titled “Dying to Kill Us: Understanding the Mindset of Suicide Operations,” the cost is $7,856. For a three-day course for 30 people on “Informant Development for Law Enforcement to FighTerrorism,” the cost is $23,568.

The training pushes anti-Muslim ideology. On the section of their website where they list feedback from participants of the courses, one wrote: “An eye-opener. Especially how many Muslim Brotherhood front organizations there are and that the government doesn’t get it.” 

5. Security Solutions International

Security Solutions International is yet another private firm hawking anti-Muslim training to law enforcement. This Miami-based company founded in 2004 uses its Israeli security connections to boost its standing in the market. They use Israeli security trainers in their courses and their president, Henry Morgenstern, is a dual Israeli-U.S. citizen who says he “developed excellent high level contacts with the Security Establishment [in Israel], making SSI the premiere training company for counter-terror related subjects.”


The company has trained over 700 law enforcement agencies since 2004. Officials from law enforcement agencies like the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority and the Department of Homeland Security have participated in the conferences they put on for profit. While SSI claims that they don't cast aspersions on the whole of Islam, an examination of their training's, conferences and the speakers they use indicate otherwise.

At a 2009 conference sponsored by Police magazine, an SSI instructor who is the company's “expert” on Islam used a video that showed a terrorist beheading a hostage. After the course was met with criticism, the company's CEO said “their religion got linked to terrorism a long time ago.”

The conferences they hold are usually well-attended, and this year SSI is putting on a conference in Orlando, Florida for three days. The cost for each attendee is $400. The keynote speaker this year is Steve Emerson, a well-known member of what's been termed the “Islamophobia industry.” SSI also makes money off its Counter Terrorist magazine. A yearly subscription is $35, and the company says it has 15,000 subscribers.

Sources & References:
Sydney Morning Herald, 
whatsupic.com, 
davidicke.com

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please be advised that submitted comments will only be published if they are free from obscene profanity, explicit phrases and personal character assassinations containing explicit language. Please feel free to express your opinion, however we do request that all comments are of a courteous nature. No abusive or vulgar comments will be published.